Glide, Softr, Bubble, FlutterFlow, Retool, an internal tool somebody built for you, an AI whose name you never caught: the eight named elsewhere on this site are the ones people arrive with most often and they are not the only ones. None of the faults below belongs to a tool. They come from generated code reaching a real domain before anybody decided who owns a row, where a credential lives, or what should happen when a request is refused. That short list is the same whatever wrote the code.
Keys, addresses and switches were typed into the place you were working and nowhere the running site can read them. Hosted builders put a publish button over that gap, so the result reads as the whole app being broken rather than as one absent value. What the project asks for against what the live environment holds is the first comparison we make.
A generated table gives a row a title and a date and no owner, so every read has to remember to filter by hand and one query written in a hurry returns the lot. It behaves correctly for as long as yours is the only account, which is what keeps it in place until the second customer signs up.
Sign-in exists, and nothing after it asks whether this person may have this particular record. Hidden menus and disabled buttons stand in for the check, and they hold until somebody edits an identifier in an address. Platforms differ in where that question can be enforced; they do not differ in having to ask it.
Whatever the fault turns out to be, the first hour of it goes on establishing that the fault occurred: an error caught and replaced with a courteous message, a platform whose history reaches back two days, no trace of which payments or enquiries were even attempted. Somewhere for failures to be written down is usually the cheapest line in a quote and the one that shortens every quote after it.
Each round adjusts the screen that misbehaved and leaves the contradiction underneath it in place, so the fault relocates instead of closing. Projects reach us several layers into that, and some of those layers are now carrying weight nobody intended, which is why they cannot be stripped out in one pass.
$199$349promo
You send a link, a repo, or both. We reproduce the problem, read the code, and record a short walkthrough: what's broken, why it broke, and what it takes to fix. You get written findings and a fixed quote.
Book my auditPriced after the audit
Scoped from the audit and agreed before anything starts. We fix the cause rather than the symptom, and hand back something maintainable, with a written note on what changed and why.
Nobody can price this honestly before seeing the code. The audit is what makes a firm number possible.
The audit is a fixed price and you know it before you pay. Everything after it is quoted from what the audit actually found, and you approve the number before any work starts.
What we can show you is who does the work, what it costs, and how well we already know the failure you are staring at.
This is run by a small web agency. The person who records your audit is the person who does the fix, so you're not being routed to an anonymous bidder.
$199$349promo
Plenty of people take the findings and do the work themselves, or hand them to their own developer. That is a fine outcome and nothing is bundled to stop it.
Book my auditYou approve a number before work starts. If the job turns out harder than we estimated, that's ours to absorb, not a change order.
Security is the part an AI builder is quietest about. None of these stop the app working, which is exactly why they ship.
If you recognised your own problem somewhere above, that is the point. The audit is where you find out which one it actually is.
$199$349promo
One fixed-price audit at $199 instead of $349. A video walkthrough, written findings and a firm quote on what it takes to fix.